🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold forecast – going beyond the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible where election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However the winner added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously backed the progressive now. However it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could go over 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report at that time. So it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I hope he does because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.